↓ Skip to main content

The Anatomy of the Pubic Region Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
The Anatomy of the Pubic Region Revisited
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200939030-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett A. Robertson, Priscilla J. Barker, Marius Fahrer, Anthony G. Schache

Abstract

Chronic groin pain is a common complaint for athletes participating in sports that involve repetitive sprinting, kicking or twisting movements, such as Australian Rules football, soccer and ice hockey. It is frequently a multifactorial condition that presents a considerable challenge for the treating sports medicine practitioner. To better understand the pathogenesis of chronic groin pain in athletes, a precise anatomical knowledge of the pubic symphysis and surrounding soft tissues is required. Several alternative descriptions of pubic region structures have been proposed. Traditionally, chronic groin pain in athletes has been described in terms of discrete pathology requiring specific intervention. While this clinical reasoning may apply in some cases, a review of anatomical findings indicates the possibility of multiple pathologies coexisting in athletes with chronic groin pain. An appreciation of these alternative descriptions may assist sports medicine practitioners with diagnostic and clinical decision-making processes. The purpose of this literature review is to reappraise the anatomy of the pubic region, considering findings from cadaveric dissection and histology studies, as well as those from diagnostic imaging studies in athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 156 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 30%
Sports and Recreations 28 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Materials Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,117
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,066
of 192,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#453
of 831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.