↓ Skip to main content

Internet addiction disorder and problematic use of Google Glass™ in patient treated at a residential substance abuse treatment program

Overview of attention for article published in Addictive Behaviors, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 4,446)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
85 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet addiction disorder and problematic use of Google Glass™ in patient treated at a residential substance abuse treatment program
Published in
Addictive Behaviors, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Yung, Erin Eickhoff, Diane L. Davis, Warren P. Klam, Andrew P. Doan

Abstract

Internet addiction disorder (IAD) is characterized by the problematic use of online video games, computer use, and mobile handheld devices. While not officially a clinical diagnosis according to the most recent version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), individuals with IAD manifest severe emotional, social, and mental dysfunction in multiple areas of daily activities due to their problematic use of technology and the internet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Computer Science 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 456. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#60,765
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Addictive Behaviors
#13
of 4,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#457
of 263,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addictive Behaviors
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.