Title |
Parity and disparity in first course treatment of invasive breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10549-007-9675-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Jo Lund, Otis P. Brawley, Kevin C. Ward, John L. Young, Sheryl S. G. Gabram, J. William Eley |
Abstract |
Adherence to first course treatment guidelines for breast cancer may not be uniform across racial/ethnic groups and could be a major contributing factor to disparities in outcome. In this population-based study, we assessed racial differences in initial treatment of breast cancer. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 32% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,982,004
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#279
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,061
of 67,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.