↓ Skip to main content

The P/N (Positive-to-Negative Links) Ratio in Complex Networks—A Promising In Silico Biomarker for Detecting Changes Occurring in the Human Microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The P/N (Positive-to-Negative Links) Ratio in Complex Networks—A Promising In Silico Biomarker for Detecting Changes Occurring in the Human Microbiome
Published in
Microbial Ecology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-1079-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhanshan (Sam) Ma

Abstract

Relatively little progress in the methodology for differentiating between the healthy and diseased microbiomes, beyond comparing microbial community diversities with traditional species richness or Shannon index, has been made. Network analysis has increasingly been called for the task, but most currently available microbiome datasets only allows for the construction of simple species correlation networks (SCNs). The main results from SCN analysis are a series of network properties such as network degree and modularity, but the metrics for these network properties often produce inconsistent evidence. We propose a simple new network property, the P/N ratio, defined as the ratio of positive links to the number of negative links in the microbial SCN. We postulate that the P/N ratio should reflect the balance between facilitative and inhibitive interactions among microbial species, possibly one of the most important changes occurring in diseased microbiome. We tested our hypothesis with five datasets representing five major human microbiome sites and discovered that the P/N ratio exhibits contrasting differences between healthy and diseased microbiomes and may be harnessed as an in silico biomarker for detecting disease-associated changes in the human microbiome, and may play an important role in personalized diagnosis of the human microbiome-associated diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Computer Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,805,219
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#603
of 2,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,491
of 324,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.