↓ Skip to main content

Nodding syndrome—a new hypothesis and new direction for research

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Infectious Diseases, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nodding syndrome—a new hypothesis and new direction for research
Published in
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Colebunders, Adam Hendy, Miriam Nanyunja, Joseph Francis Wamala, Marieke van Oijen

Abstract

Nodding syndrome (NS) is an unexplained neurological illness that mainly affects children aged between 5 and 15 years. NS has so far been reported from South Sudan, northern Uganda, and Tanzania, but in spite of extensive investigations, the aetiology remains unknown. We hypothesize that blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) infected with Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae may also transmit another pathogen. This may be a novel neurotropic virus or an endosymbiont of the microfilariae, which causes not only NS, but also epilepsy without nodding. This hypothesis addresses many of the questions about NS that researchers have previously been unable to answer. An argument in favour of the hypothesis is the fact that in Uganda, the number of new NS cases decreased (with no new cases reported since 2013) after ivermectin coverage was increased and with the implementation of a programme of aerial spraying and larviciding of the large rivers where blackflies were breeding. If confirmed, our hypothesis will enable new strategies to control NS outbreaks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,549,962
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#532
of 4,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,729
of 247,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.