↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3403-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan J. De Waele, J. Lipman, M. Akova, M. Bassetti, G. Dimopoulos, M. Kaukonen, D. Koulenti, C. Martin, P. Montravers, J. Rello, A. Rhodes, A. A. Udy, T. Starr, S. C. Wallis, J. A. Roberts

Abstract

Risk factors for β-lactam antibiotic underdosing in critically ill patients have not been described in large-scale studies. The objective of this study was to describe pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target non-attainment envisioning empirical dosing in critically ill patients and considering a worst-case scenario as well as to identify patient characteristics that are associated with target non-attainment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 37 28%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,639,743
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,428
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,534
of 228,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.