↓ Skip to main content

Do American States with More Religious or Conservative Populations Search More for Sexual Content on Google?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
84 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Do American States with More Religious or Conservative Populations Search More for Sexual Content on Google?
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0361-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara C. MacInnis, Gordon Hodson

Abstract

In America, religiosity and conservatism are generally associated with opposition to non-traditional sexual behavior, but prominent political scandals and recent research suggest a paradoxical private attraction to sexual content on the political and religious right. We examined associations between state-level religiosity/conservatism and anonymized interest in searching for sexual content online using Google Trends (which calculates within-state search volumes for search terms). Across two separate years, and controlling for demographic variables, we observed moderate-to-large positive associations between: (1) greater proportions of state-level religiosity and general web searching for sexual content and (2) greater proportions of state-level conservatism and image-specific searching for sex. These findings were interpreted in terms of the paradoxical hypothesis that a greater preponderance of right-leaning ideologies is associated with greater preoccupation with sexual content in private internet activity. Alternative explanations (e.g., that opposition to non-traditional sex in right-leaning states leads liberals to rely on private internet sexual activity) are discussed, as are limitations to inference posed by aggregate data more generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 30%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#227,366
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#147
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,042
of 267,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.