↓ Skip to main content

WD40-repeat 47, a microtubule-associated protein, is essential for brain development and autophagy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WD40-repeat 47, a microtubule-associated protein, is essential for brain development and autophagy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1713625114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghna Kannan, Efil Bayam, Christel Wagner, Bruno Rinaldi, Perrine F. Kretz, Peggy Tilly, Marna Roos, Lara McGillewie, Séverine Bär, Shilpi Minocha, Claire Chevalier, Chrystelle Po, Jamel Chelly, Jean-Louis Mandel, Renato Borgatti, Amélie Piton, Craig Kinnear, Ben Loos, David J. Adams, Yann Hérault, Stephan C. Collins, Sylvie Friant, Juliette D. Godin, Binnaz Yalcin, Valerie E. Vancollie, Lauren F. E. Anthony, Simon A. Maguire, David Lafont, Selina A. Pearson, Amy S. Gates, Mark Sanderson, Carl Shannon, Maksymilian T. Sumowski, Robbie S. B. McLaren-Jones, Agnieszka Swiatkowska, Christopher M. Isherwood, Emma L. Cambridge, Heather M. Wilson, Susana S. Caetano, Anna Karin B. Maguire, Antonella Galli, Anneliese O. Speak, Joshua Dench, Elizabeth Tuck, Jeanne Estabel, Angela Green, Catherine Tudor, Emma Siragher, Monika Dabrowska, Cecilia Icoresi Mazzeo, Yvette Hooks, Fiona Kussy, Mark Griffiths, David Gannon, Brendan Doe, Katharina Boroviak, Hannah Wardle-Jones, Nicola Griggs, Joanna Bottomley, Ed Ryder, Diane Gleeson, Jacqueline K. White, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis, Christopher J. Lelliott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 21%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,238,286
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#61,033
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,452
of 338,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#626
of 955 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 955 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.