↓ Skip to main content

Impaired functional integration in multiple sclerosis: a graph theory study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Impaired functional integration in multiple sclerosis: a graph theory study
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0896-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria A. Rocca, Paola Valsasina, Alessandro Meani, Andrea Falini, Giancarlo Comi, Massimo Filippi

Abstract

Aim of this study was to explore the topological organization of functional brain network connectivity in a large cohort of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and to assess whether its disruption contributes to disease clinical manifestations. Graph theoretical analysis was applied to resting state fMRI data from 246 MS patients and 55 matched healthy controls (HC). Functional connectivity between 116 cortical and subcortical brain regions was estimated using a bivariate correlation analysis. Global network properties (network degree, global efficiency, hierarchy, path length and assortativity) were abnormal in MS patients vs HC, and contributed to distinguish cognitively impaired MS patients (34 %) from HC, but not the main MS clinical phenotypes. Compared to HC, MS patients also showed: (1) a loss of hubs in the superior frontal gyrus, precuneus and anterior cingulum in the left hemisphere; (2) a different lateralization of basal ganglia hubs (mostly located in the left hemisphere in HC, and in the right hemisphere in MS patients); and (3) a formation of hubs, not seen in HC, in the left temporal pole and cerebellum. MS patients also experienced a decreased nodal degree in the bilateral caudate nucleus and right cerebellum. Such a modification of regional network properties contributed to cognitive impairment and phenotypic variability of MS. An impairment of global integration (likely to reflect a reduced competence in information exchange between distant brain areas) occurs in MS and is associated with cognitive deficits. A regional redistribution of network properties contributes to cognitive status and phenotypic variability of these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 159 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Psychology 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Computer Science 9 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#1,236
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,813
of 256,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.