↓ Skip to main content

Guided Internet‐based vs. face‐to‐face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in World Psychiatry, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
937 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1016 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guided Internet‐based vs. face‐to‐face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
World Psychiatry, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/wps.20151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Andersson, Pim Cuijpers, Per Carlbring, Heleen Riper, Erik Hedman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,016 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 989 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 202 20%
Student > Bachelor 152 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 139 14%
Researcher 124 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 67 7%
Other 136 13%
Unknown 196 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 519 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 101 10%
Social Sciences 41 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 3%
Computer Science 27 3%
Other 64 6%
Unknown 232 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 273. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#133,476
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Psychiatry
#38
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,165
of 269,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Psychiatry
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.