| Title |
Is the pharmacy profession innovative enough?: meeting the needs of Australian residents with chronic conditions and their carers using the nominal group technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara S McMillan, Adem Sav, Fiona Kelly, Michelle A King, Jennifer A Whitty, Amanda J Wheeler |
| Abstract |
Community pharmacies are ideally located as a source of support for people with chronic conditions. Yet, we have limited insight into what innovative pharmacy services would support this consumer group to manage their condition/s. The aim of this study was to identify what innovations people with chronic conditions and their carers want from their ideal community pharmacy, and compare with what pharmacists and pharmacy support staff think consumers want. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,922,018
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,289
of 7,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,707
of 256,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#106
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.