You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pre-pulse inhibition and antisaccade performance indicate impaired attention modulation of cognitive inhibition in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-6-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Louise McCabe, Rebbekah Josephine Atkinson, Gavin Cooper, Jessica Lauren Melville, Jill Harris, Ulrich Schall, Carmel Maree Loughland, Renate Thienel, Linda Elisabet Campbell |
| Abstract |
22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is associated with a number of physical anomalies and neuropsychological deficits including impairments in executive and sensorimotor function. It is estimated that 25% of children with 22q11DS will develop schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders later in life. Evidence of genetic transmission of information processing deficits in schizophrenia suggests performance in 22q11DS individuals will enhance understanding of the neurobiological and genetic substrates associated with information processing. In this report, we examine information processing in 22q11DS using measures of startle eyeblink modification and antisaccade inhibition to explore similarities with schizophrenia and associations with neurocognitive performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,190,058
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#145
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,928
of 250,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.