↓ Skip to main content

Performance of statistical methods on CHARGE targeted sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Performance of statistical methods on CHARGE targeted sequencing data
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12863-014-0104-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuanhua Xing, Josée Dupuis, L Adrienne Cupples

Abstract

BackgroundThe CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) Sequencing Project is a national, collaborative effort from 3 studies: Framingham Heart Study (FHS), Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC). It uses a case-cohort design, whereby a random sample of study participants is enriched with participants in extremes of traits. Although statistical methods are available to investigate the role of rare variants, few have evaluated their performance in a case-cohort design.ResultsWe evaluate several methods, including the sequence kernel association test (SKAT), Score-Seq, and weighted (Madsen and Browning) and unweighted burden tests. Using genotypes from the CHARGE targeted-sequencing project for FHS (n =¿1096), we simulate phenotypes in a large population for 11 correlated traits and then sample individuals to mimic the CHARGE Sequencing study design. We evaluate type I error and power for 77 targeted regions.ConclusionsWe provide some guidelines on the performance of these aggregate-based tests to detect associations with rare variants when applied to case-cohort study designs, using CHARGE targeted sequencing data. Type I error is conservative when we consider variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <¿1%. Power is generally low, although it is relatively larger for Score-Seq. Greater numbers of causal variants and a greater proportion of variance improve the power, but it tends to be lower in the presence of bi-directionality of effects of causal genotypes, especially for Score-Seq.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2014.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#1,008
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,537
of 266,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.