↓ Skip to main content

Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines
Published in
Educational technology research and development, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
Authors

David H. Jonassen, Bosung Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 5%
Colombia 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 278 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 23%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 11%
Researcher 28 9%
Professor 16 5%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 51 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 122 40%
Computer Science 20 7%
Psychology 19 6%
Physics and Astronomy 17 6%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#789
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,919
of 171,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.