↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11910-013-0407-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse Mez, Robert A. Stern, Ann C. McKee

Abstract

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE, previously called punch drunk and dementia pugilistica) has a rich history in the medical literature in association with boxing, but has only recently been recognized with other contact sports, such as football and ice hockey, as well as with military blast injuries. CTE is thought to be a neurodegenerative disease associated with repeated concussive and subconcussive blows to the head. There is characteristic gross and microscopic pathology found in the brain, including frontal and temporal atrophy, axonal degeneration, and hyperphosphorylated tau and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 pathology. Clinically, there are characteristic progressive deficits in cognition (memory, executive dysfunction), behavior (explosivity, aggression), mood (depression, suicidality), and motor function (parkinsonism), which correlate with the anatomic distribution of brain pathology. While CTE shares clinical and neuropathological traits with other neurodegenerative diseases, the clinical syndrome and the neuropathology as a whole are distinct from other neurodegenerative diseases. Here we review the CTE literature to date. We also draw on the literature from mild traumatic brain injury and other neurodegenerative dementias, particularly when these studies provide guidance for future CTE research. We conclude by suggesting seven essential areas for future CTE research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Psychology 15 15%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,594,533
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#62
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,572
of 213,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.