↓ Skip to main content

Does capitated managed care affect budget predictability? Evidence from Medicaid programs

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Does capitated managed care affect budget predictability? Evidence from Medicaid programs
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10754-017-9227-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Perez

Abstract

As the second largest item in the budget of every US state, Medicaid budget stability and financial transparency have significance for every state. This study is the first to test whether managed care enrollment reduces the variance of Medicaid spending, in contrast to the focus of the existing literature on spending levels. This variance bears directly on whether budget constrained states whether budget constrained states benefit from managed care in the form of stabilized spending, leading to improved budget predictability. Capitated payments stabilize spending at the margin, but the effects may be unobservable in aggregate due to variation in enrollment, which is directly measured in the analysis, or selection bias, which is unobserved. Although the majority of Medicaid enrollees are in managed care, the study shows that managed care use has been concentrated among the enrollees with the most stable spending, resulting in only small gains to budget predictability. This finding is robust to the exclusion of the claims expenditures that exhibit the most variance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,943,816
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#27
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,918
of 329,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them