↓ Skip to main content

周産期管理に苦慮した境界性パーソナリティ障害の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
周産期管理に苦慮した境界性パーソナリティ障害の1例
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, July 2014
DOI 10.18977/jspog.19.1_117
Authors

阿部 万祐子, 安尾 忠浩, 大坪 昌弘, 藁谷 深洋子, 岩佐 弘一, 北脇 城

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,265,075
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology
#4
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,129
of 242,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them