↓ Skip to main content

Domestic horses (Equus caballus) prefer to approach humans displaying a submissive body posture rather than a dominant body posture

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Domestic horses (Equus caballus) prefer to approach humans displaying a submissive body posture rather than a dominant body posture
Published in
Animal Cognition, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10071-017-1140-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Victoria Smith, Clara Wilson, Karen McComb, Leanne Proops

Abstract

Signals of dominance and submissiveness are central to conspecific communication in many species. For domestic animals, sensitivities to these signals in humans may also be beneficial. We presented domestic horses with a free choice between two unfamiliar humans, one adopting a submissive and the other a dominant body posture, with vocal and facial cues absent. Horses had previously been given food rewards by both human demonstrators, adopting neutral postures, to encourage approach behaviour. Across four counterbalanced test trials, horses showed a significant preference for approaching the submissive posture in both the first trial and across subsequent trials, and no individual subject showed an overall preference for dominant postures. There was no significant difference in latency to approach the two postures. This study provides novel evidence that domestic horses may spontaneously discriminate between, and attribute communicative significance to, human body postures of dominance; and further, that familiarity with the signaller is not a requirement for this response. These findings raise interesting questions about the plasticity of social signal perception across the species barrier.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 12%
Psychology 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#274,762
of 24,162,141 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#82
of 1,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,002
of 329,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.