↓ Skip to main content

Disease Risk in a Dynamic Environment: The Spread of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Minnesota, USA

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Disease Risk in a Dynamic Environment: The Spread of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Minnesota, USA
Published in
EcoHealth, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10393-014-0979-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacie J. Robinson, David F. Neitzel, Ronald A. Moen, Meggan E. Craft, Karin E. Hamilton, Lucinda B. Johnson, David J. Mulla, Ulrike G. Munderloh, Patrick T. Redig, Kirk E. Smith, Clarence L. Turner, Jamie K. Umber, Katharine M. Pelican

Abstract

As humans and climate change alter the landscape, novel disease risk scenarios emerge. Understanding the complexities of pathogen emergence and subsequent spread as shaped by landscape heterogeneity is crucial to understanding disease emergence, pinpointing high-risk areas, and mitigating emerging disease threats in a dynamic environment. Tick-borne diseases present an important public health concern and incidence of many of these diseases are increasing in the United States. The complex epidemiology of tick-borne diseases includes strong ties with environmental factors that influence host availability, vector abundance, and pathogen transmission. Here, we used 16 years of case data from the Minnesota Department of Health to report spatial and temporal trends in Lyme disease (LD), human anaplasmosis, and babesiosis. We then used a spatial regression framework to evaluate the impact of landscape and climate factors on the spread of LD. Finally, we use the fitted model, and landscape and climate datasets projected under varying climate change scenarios, to predict future changes in tick-borne pathogen risk. Both forested habitat and temperature were important drivers of LD spread in Minnesota. Dramatic changes in future temperature regimes and forest communities predict rising risk of tick-borne disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 27%
Environmental Science 19 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,198,770
of 24,201,556 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#189
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,672
of 258,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,201,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.