↓ Skip to main content

Cigarettes vs. e-cigarettes: Passive exposure at home measured by means of airborne marker and biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
48 X users
facebook
36 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cigarettes vs. e-cigarettes: Passive exposure at home measured by means of airborne marker and biomarkers
Published in
Environmental Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Montse Ballbè, Jose M. Martínez-Sánchez, Xisca Sureda, Marcela Fu, Raúl Pérez-Ortuño, José A. Pascual, Esteve Saltó, Esteve Fernández

Abstract

There is scarce evidence about passive exposure to the vapour released or exhaled from electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) under real conditions. The aim of this study is to characterise passive exposure to nicotine from e-cigarettes׳ vapour and conventional cigarettes׳ smoke at home among non-smokers under real-use conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 261 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 19%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Psychology 21 8%
Chemistry 18 7%
Environmental Science 17 6%
Other 84 31%
Unknown 55 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#238,474
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research
#121
of 7,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,170
of 263,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.