You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - Results from the Bergen COPD Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0109721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunnar R. Husebø, Per S. Bakke, Marianne Aanerud, Jon A. Hardie, Thor Ueland, Rune Grønseth, Louise J. P. Persson, Pål Aukrust, Tomas M. Eagan |
| Abstract |
COPD exacerbations accelerate disease progression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,277,129
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,091
of 194,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,207
of 253,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#742
of 5,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.