↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Behavior and Risk Factors for HIV Infection Among Homosexual and Bisexual Men in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Behavior and Risk Factors for HIV Infection Among Homosexual and Bisexual Men in Thailand
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10461-008-9448-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Li, Anchalee Varangrat, Wipas Wimonsate, Tareerat Chemnasiri, Chalinthorn Sinthuwattanawibool, Praphan Phanuphak, Rapeepun Jommaroeng, Sten Vermund, Frits van Griensven

Abstract

HIV prevalence and associated risk behaviors were examined among Thai bisexually active men (MSMW, n = 450) and men who have sex with men only (MSM-only, n = 1,125). Cross sectional venue-day-time sampling was used to collect data. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to identify HIV risk factors. HIV prevalence was 8.2% among MSMW and 21.2% among MSM-only. Consistent condom use with male partners was higher among MSMW (77.6%) than MSM-only (62.9%), and lower with female partners (44.4%). Lack of family confidant, migration, concern about acquiring HIV infection, and self-reported STD were associated with HIV prevalence among MSMW. Older age, lower educational level, residing in Bangkok or Chiang Mai, living away from family, recruitment from a sauna, increased frequency of visiting the surveyed venue, practicing receptive or both receptive and insertive anal intercourse, inconsistent condom use with male paying partners, and a history of drug use were associated with HIV prevalence in MSM-only.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 36%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,007,560
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#264
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,278
of 86,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.