↓ Skip to main content

A Statewide Common Elements Initiative for Children’s Mental Health

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
A Statewide Common Elements Initiative for Children’s Mental Health
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11414-014-9430-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon Dorsey, Lucy Berliner, Aaron R. Lyon, Michael D. Pullmann, Laura K. Murray

Abstract

Many evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for child and adolescent mental health disorders have been developed, but few are available in public mental health settings. This paper describes initial implementation outcomes for a state-funded effort in Washington State to increase EBT availability, via a common elements training and consultation approach focused on four major problem areas (anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and behavioral problems). Clinicians (N = 180) reported significant improvement in their ability to assess and treat all problem areas at post-consultation. Clinicians from organizations with a supervisor-level "EBT champion" had higher baseline scores on a range of outcomes, but many differences disappeared at post-consultation. Outcomes suggest that a common elements initiative, which includes training and consultation, may positively impact clinician-level outcomes and that having "in-house" EBT expertise may provide additional benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 48%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,550,591
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#182
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,152
of 232,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.