You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supplemental feeding alters migration of a temperate ungulate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1890/13-2092.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer D. Jones, Matthew J. Kauffman, Kevin L. Monteith, Brandon M. Scurlock, Shannon E. Albeke, Paul C. Cross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 67% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,236,111
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#591
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,679
of 259,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.