| Title |
An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah M Caldwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| South Africa | 2 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,464,499
of 24,242,692 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#650
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,466
of 257,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,242,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.