↓ Skip to main content

Second and third trimester amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells can repopulate a de-cellularized lung scaffold and express lung markers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Second and third trimester amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells can repopulate a de-cellularized lung scaffold and express lung markers
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Vadasz, Todd Jensen, Camilo Moncada, Eric Girard, Fan Zhang, Alex Blanchette, Christine Finck

Abstract

This study examined the potential of amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells (AF-MSCs) to generate lung precursor cells in vitro and on a xenologous three-dimensional de-cellularized lung scaffold.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Engineering 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#1,263
of 4,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,461
of 241,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.