↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous IgG hypogammaglobulinaemia in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Endogenous IgG hypogammaglobulinaemia in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-3845-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu Shankar-Hari, Nicholas Culshaw, Benjamin Post, Eduardo Tamayo, David Andaluz-Ojeda, Jesús F. Bermejo-Martín, Sebastian Dietz, Karl Werdan, Richard Beale, Jo Spencer, Mervyn Singer

Abstract

Plasma immunoglobulin concentrations are acutely altered in critically ill patients with sepsis. However, the association between immunoglobulin levels on the day of sepsis diagnosis and subsequent mortality is inconsistent. Systematic review of studies that report immunoglobulin measurements and mortality among adults with sepsis managed in a critical care setting. Fixed and random effect meta-analyses were conducted using low IgG levels as primary exposure and acute mortality as the primary outcome. Both variables were used as defined in individual studies. The prevalence of a low immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration on the day of sepsis diagnosis was variable [58.3 % (IQR 38.4-65.5 %)]. Three cut-off points (6.1, 6.5 and 8.7 g/L) were used to define the lower limit of IgG concentrations in the included studies. A subnormal IgG level on the day of sepsis diagnosis was not associated with an increased risk of death in adult patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock by both fixed and random effect meta-analysis (OR [95 % CI] 1.32 [0.93-1.87] and 1.48 [0.78-2.81], respectively). This systematic review identifies studies of limited quality reporting heterogeneous sepsis cohorts with varying lower limits of normal for IgG. Although our data suggest that a subnormal IgG measurement on the day of sepsis diagnosis does not identify a subgroup of patients with a higher risk of death, further studies are needed to confirm or refute this finding, and whether optimal cut-offs and time windows can be defined for IgG measurement. This would determine whether patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis could be stratified using IgG levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,715,958
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,018
of 5,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,445
of 269,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#27
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.