↓ Skip to main content

Hospital readmission in heart failure, a novel analysis of a longstanding problem

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Hospital readmission in heart failure, a novel analysis of a longstanding problem
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10741-014-9459-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett W. Sperry, George Ruiz, Samer S. Najjar

Abstract

Acute decompensated heart failure is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the USA. It is the most common reason for admission in the Medicare population and the greatest cause of hospital readmission in both medical and surgical patients. As many of these readmissions are considered preventable, providers and hospital systems are seeking novel strategies to reduce rehospitalization. Several specific interventions have been shown to decrease readmission for heart failure. However, these are typically narrow in scope, focusing on one aspect of patient care and providing a one-size-fits-all approach. We review the data and propose integrating some of these interventions into a comprehensive patient-centered model that is organized into six categories: quality of medical management, early reassessment, health literacy, neuropsychological status, financial means and functional status. By screening for deficiencies in each of these categories, providers and hospital systems can use resources more efficiently to make targeted interventions to improve health outcomes and mitigate readmissions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 21 14%
Other 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 18%
Psychology 11 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 41 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2014.
All research outputs
#13,964,036
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#372
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,529
of 260,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.