↓ Skip to main content

Sustainability of threatened species displayed in public aquaria, with a case study of Australian sharks and rays

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Sustainability of threatened species displayed in public aquaria, with a case study of Australian sharks and rays
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9501-2
Authors

Kathryn A. Buckley, David A. Crook, Richard D. Pillans, Liam Smith, Peter M. Kyne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 15%
Environmental Science 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Decision Sciences 5 5%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,804,826
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#148
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,684
of 330,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.