You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Refractory cardiac arrest treated with mechanical CPR, hypothermia, ECMO and early reperfusion (the CHEER trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dion Stub, Stephen Bernard, Vincent Pellegrino, Karen Smith, Tony Walker, Jayne Sheldrake, Lisen Hockings, James Shaw, Stephen J Duffy, Aidan Burrell, Peter Cameron, De Villiers Smit, David M Kaye |
| Abstract |
Many patients who suffer cardiac arrest do not respond to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. There is growing interest in utilizing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) in the management of refractory cardiac arrest. We describe our preliminary experiences in establishing an E-CPR program for refractory cardiac arrest in Melbourne, Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 57 | 23% |
| United States | 43 | 18% |
| Australia | 21 | 9% |
| Canada | 14 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 54 | 22% |
| Scientists | 32 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 464 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Researcher | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 8% |
| Other | 126 | 26% |
| Unknown | 94 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 274 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Unknown | 119 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#178,543
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#26
of 5,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,562
of 266,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.