You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACP Journal Club, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.7326/m14-0933 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G Dunn, Diana Arachi, Joel Hudgins, Guy Tsafnat, Enrico Coiera, Florence T Bourgeois |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 10% |
| Australia | 8 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Turkey | 5 | 6% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 67% |
| Scientists | 16 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#257,444
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#1,056
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,392
of 268,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#7
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.