You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “Syringe” Technique: A Hands-Free Approach for the Reduction of Acute Nontraumatic Temporomandibular Dislocations in the Emergency Department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Gorchynski, Eddie Karabidian, Michael Sanchez |
| Abstract |
The traditional intraoral manual reduction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dislocations is time consuming, difficult, and at times ineffective, and commonly requires conscious sedation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 20% |
| Spain | 9 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 68% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#599,212
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#65
of 3,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,015
of 265,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.