↓ Skip to main content

AWARE—AWAreness during REsuscitation—A prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 5,734)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
462 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AWARE—AWAreness during REsuscitation—A prospective study
Published in
Resuscitation, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Parnia, Ken Spearpoint, Gabriele de Vos, Peter Fenwick, Diana Goldberg, Jie Yang, Jiawen Zhu, Katie Baker, Hayley Killingback, Paula McLean, Melanie Wood, A. Maziar Zafari, Neal Dickert, Roland Beisteiner, Fritz Sterz, Michael Berger, Celia Warlow, Siobhan Bullock, Salli Lovett, Russell Metcalfe Smith McPara, Sandra Marti-Navarette, Pam Cushing, Paul Wills, Kayla Harris, Jenny Sutton, Anthony Walmsley, Charles D. Deakin, Paul Little, Mark Farber, Bruce Greyson, Elinor R. Schoenfeld

Abstract

Cardiac arrest (CA) survivors experience cognitive deficits including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is unclear whether these are related to cognitive/mental experiences and awareness during CPR. Despite anecdotal reports the broad range of cognitive/mental experiences and awareness associated with CPR has not been systematically studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 334 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 15%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 9%
Other 94 26%
Unknown 43 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 29%
Psychology 73 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 60 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 980. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,988
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#3
of 5,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 268,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.