| Title |
Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ethics in public health programmes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Schröder-Bäck, Peter Duncan, William Sherlaw, Caroline Brall, Katarzyna Czabanowska |
| Abstract |
Teaching ethics in public health programmes is not routine everywhere - at least not in most schools of public health in the European region. Yet empirical evidence shows that schools of public health are more and more interested in the integration of ethics in their curricula, since public health professionals often have to face difficult ethical decisions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 21 | 18% |
| United States | 15 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 474 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 105 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 16% |
| Unknown | 149 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 160 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#246,343
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,278
of 268,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.