↓ Skip to main content

RNA polymerase II stalling at pre-mRNA splice sites is enforced by ubiquitination of the catalytic subunit

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA polymerase II stalling at pre-mRNA splice sites is enforced by ubiquitination of the catalytic subunit
Published in
eLife, October 2017
DOI 10.7554/elife.27082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Milligan, Camille Sayou, Alex Tuck, Tatsiana Auchynnikava, Jane EA Reid, Ross Alexander, Flavia de Lima Alves, Robin Allshire, Christos Spanos, Juri Rappsilber, Jean D Beggs, Grzegorz Kudla, David Tollervey

Abstract

Numerous links exist between co-transcriptional RNA processing and the transcribing RNAPII. In particular, pre-mRNA splicing was reported to be associated with slowed RNAPII elongation. Here we identify a site of ubiquitination (K1246) in the catalytic subunit of RNAPII close to the DNA entry path. Ubiquitination was increased in the absence of the Bre5-Ubp3 ubiquitin protease complex. Bre5 binds RNA in vivo, with a preference for exon 2 regions of intron-containing pre-mRNAs and poly(A) proximal sites. Ubiquitinated RNAPII showed similar enrichment. The absence of Bre5 led to impaired splicing and defects in RNAPII elongation in vivo on a splicing reporter construct. Strains expressing RNAPII with a K1246R mutation showed reduced cotranscriptional splicing. We propose that ubiquinitation of RNAPII is induced by RNA processing events and linked to transcriptional pausing, which is released by Bre5-Ubp3 associated with the nascent transcript.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,865,426
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#10,319
of 13,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,292
of 325,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#277
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.