↓ Skip to main content

Chondrosarcomas of the head and neck

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Chondrosarcomas of the head and neck
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00405-013-2807-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Coca-Pelaz, Juan P. Rodrigo, Asterios Triantafyllou, Jennifer L. Hunt, Juan C. Fernández-Miranda, Primož Strojan, Remco de Bree, Alessandra Rinaldo, Robert P. Takes, Alfio Ferlito

Abstract

Chondrosarcoma represents approximately 11 % of all primary malignant bone tumors. It is the second most common sarcoma arising in bone after osteosarcoma. Chondrosarcomas of the head and neck are rare and may involve the sinonasal tract, jaws, larynx or skull base. Depending on the anatomical location, the tumor can produce a variety of symptoms. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the preferred imaging modalities. The histology of conventional chondrosarcoma is relatively straightforward; major challenges are the distinction between grade I chondrosarcomas and chondromas, and the differential diagnosis with chondroblastic osteosarcoma and chondroid chordoma. Surgery alone or followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is the treatment of choice. Radiotherapy alone has also been reported to be effective and can be considered if mutilating radical surgery is the only curative alternative. The 5-year survival for chondrosarcoma reaches 80 %; distant metastases and/or local recurrences significantly worsen prognosis. The present review aims to summarize the current state of information about the biology, diagnosis and management of these rare tumors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 63%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,175
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,323
of 213,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#28
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.