↓ Skip to main content

Reductive evolution of chloroplasts in non-photosynthetic plants, algae and protists

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Reductive evolution of chloroplasts in non-photosynthetic plants, algae and protists
Published in
Current Genetics, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00294-017-0761-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucia Hadariová, Matej Vesteg, Vladimír Hampl, Juraj Krajčovič

Abstract

Chloroplasts are generally known as eukaryotic organelles whose main function is photosynthesis. They perform other functions, however, such as synthesizing isoprenoids, fatty acids, heme, iron sulphur clusters and other essential compounds. In non-photosynthetic lineages that possess plastids, the chloroplast genomes have been reduced and most (or all) photosynthetic genes have been lost. Consequently, non-photosynthetic plastids have also been reduced structurally. Some of these non-photosynthetic or "cryptic" plastids were overlooked or unrecognized for decades. The number of complete plastid genome sequences and/or transcriptomes from non-photosynthetic taxa possessing plastids is rapidly increasing, thus allowing prediction of the functions of non-photosynthetic plastids in various eukaryotic lineages. In some non-photosynthetic eukaryotes with photosynthetic ancestors, no traces of plastid genomes or of plastids have been found, suggesting that they have lost the genomes or plastids completely. This review summarizes current knowledge of non-photosynthetic plastids, their genomes, structures and potential functions in free-living and parasitic plants, algae and protists. We introduce a model for the order of plastid gene losses which combines models proposed earlier for land plants with the patterns of gene retention and loss observed in protists. The rare cases of plastid genome loss and complete plastid loss are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 29%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,483,795
of 24,127,822 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#312
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,199
of 328,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.