↓ Skip to main content

Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cleaner Production, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change
Published in
Journal of Cleaner Production, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhihua Zhang, John C. Moore, Donald Huisingh, Yongxin Zhao

Abstract

Maintaining a small glottal opening across a large range of voice conditions is critical to normal voice production. This study investigated the effectiveness of vocal fold approximation and stiffening in regulating glottal opening and airflow during phonation, using a three-dimensional numerical model of phonation. The results showed that with increasing subglottal pressure the vocal folds were gradually pushed open, leading to increased mean glottal opening and flow rate. A small glottal opening and a mean glottal flow rate typical of human phonation can be maintained against increasing subglottal pressure by proportionally increasing the degree of vocal fold approximation for low to medium subglottal pressures and vocal fold stiffening at high subglottal pressures. Although sound intensity was primarily determined by the subglottal pressure, the results suggest that, to maintain small glottal opening as the sound intensity increases, one has to simultaneously tighten vocal fold approximation and/or stiffen the vocal folds, resulting in increased glottal resistance, vocal efficiency, and fundamental frequency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 254 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 58 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 56 22%
Engineering 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 56 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,143,627
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cleaner Production
#719
of 9,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,684
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cleaner Production
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.