↓ Skip to main content

Melatonin: possible implications for the postoperative and critically ill patient

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Melatonin: possible implications for the postoperative and critically ill patient
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-0061-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard S. Bourne, Gary H. Mills

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the hormone melatonin in postoperative and critically ill patients. The roles of melatonin in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, resetting of circadian rhythm disturbances and its extensive antioxidant activity have potential applications in these patient groups. The interaction between melatonin and the stresses of surgery and critical illness are explored in the context of circadian rhythms, sleep disorders and delirium. The antioxidant activity is discussed in terms of the reduction of ischaemic reperfusion injury, prevention of multi-organ failure and treatment of sepsis. Unfortunately, there is currently insufficient evidence that exogenous melatonin is effective in preventing or treating postoperative delirium. Similarly, in the critically ill patient, sleep disorders are associated with disrupted melatonin circadian secretion, but there is a paucity of data to support routine exogenous melatonin supplementation. More clinical evidence to confirm the potential benefits of melatonin therapy is required before it can be routinely used in the postoperative or critically ill patient.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Other 14 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,666,882
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,942
of 5,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,739
of 160,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.