You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the possible causal association of smoking with depression and anxiety using Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis: the CARTA consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy E Taylor, Meg E Fluharty, Johan H Bjørngaard, Maiken Elvestad Gabrielsen, Frank Skorpen, Riccardo E Marioni, Archie Campbell, Jorgen Engmann, Saira Saeed Mirza, Anu Loukola, Tiina Laatikainen, Timo Partonen, Marika Kaakinen, Francesca Ducci, Alana Cavadino, Lise Lotte N Husemoen, Tarunveer Singh Ahluwalia, Rikke Kart Jacobsen, Tea Skaaby, Jeanette Frost Ebstrup, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Camelia C Minica, Jacqueline M Vink, Gonneke Willemsen, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Caroline E Dale, Antoinette Amuzu, Lucy T Lennon, Jari Lahti, Aarno Palotie, Katri Räikkönen, Andrew Wong, Lavinia Paternoster, Angelita Pui-Yee Wong, L John Horwood, Michael Murphy, Elaine C Johnstone, Martin A Kennedy, Zdenka Pausova, Tomáš Paus, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Ellen A Nohr, Diana Kuh, Mika Kivimaki, Johan G Eriksson, Richard W Morris, Juan P Casas, Martin Preisig, Dorret I Boomsma, Allan Linneberg, Chris Power, Elina Hyppönen, Juha Veijola, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Tellervo Korhonen, Henning Tiemeier, Meena Kumari, David J Porteous, Caroline Hayward, Pål R Romundstad, George Davey Smith, Marcus R Munafò |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 52% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 268 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 18% |
| Psychology | 39 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 96 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,130,701
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,111
of 25,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,363
of 269,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#43
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.