| Title |
Conclusions of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-014-3229-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. P. van der Sluijs, V. Amaral-Rogers, L. P. Belzunces, M. F. I. J. Bijleveld van Lexmond, J-M. Bonmatin, M. Chagnon, C. A. Downs, L. Furlan, D. W. Gibbons, C. Giorio, V. Girolami, D. Goulson, D. P. Kreutzweiser, C. Krupke, M. Liess, E. Long, M. McField, P. Mineau, E. A. D. Mitchell, C. A. Morrissey, D. A. Noome, L. Pisa, J. Settele, N. Simon-Delso, J. D. Stark, A. Tapparo, H. Van Dyck, J. van Praagh, P. R. Whitehorn, M. Wiemers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 481 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 17% |
| Researcher | 83 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 173 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 107 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 122 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#586,235
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#79
of 11,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,013
of 270,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#4
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.