↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 727)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
488 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2570 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Published in
Quality & Quantity, February 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1014301607592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna E. M. Sale, Lynne H. Lohfeld, Kevin Brazil

Abstract

Health care research includes many studies that combine quantitative and qualitative methods. In this paper, we revisit the quantitative-qualitative debate and review the arguments for and against using mixed-methods. In addition, we discuss the implications stemming from our view, that the paradigms upon which the methods are based have a different view of reality and therefore a different view of the phenomenon under study. Because the two paradigms do not study the same phenomena, quantitative and qualitative methods cannot be combined for cross-validation or triangulation purposes. However, they can be combined for complementary purposes. Future standards for mixed-methods research should clearly reflect this recommendation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 54 2%
United States 32 1%
South Africa 12 <1%
Portugal 7 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Malaysia 5 <1%
New Zealand 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Other 38 1%
Unknown 2399 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 634 25%
Student > Master 496 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 255 10%
Researcher 174 7%
Student > Bachelor 151 6%
Other 467 18%
Unknown 393 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 620 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 429 17%
Psychology 196 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 154 6%
Computer Science 119 5%
Other 583 23%
Unknown 469 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,767,482
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#41
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,673
of 133,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.