You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Cohort Study of the Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Treatments Used in the “Real World”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Kotz, Jamie Brown, Robert West |
| Abstract |
To estimate the "real-world" effectiveness of commonly used aids to smoking cessation in England by using longitudinal data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Australia | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 28% |
| Psychology | 20 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#256,606
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#199
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,345
of 265,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.