↓ Skip to main content

An update on PARP inhibitors—moving to the adjuvant setting

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An update on PARP inhibitors—moving to the adjuvant setting
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir Sonnenblick, Evandro de Azambuja, Hatem A. Azim, Martine Piccart

Abstract

Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes is a potential synthetic lethal therapeutic strategy in cancers harbouring specific DNA-repair defects, including those arising in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Since the development of first-generation PARP inhibitors more than a decade ago, numerous clinical trials have been performed to validate their safety and efficacy, bringing us to the stage at which adjuvant therapy with PARP inhibitors is now being considered as a viable treatment option for patients with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the available data do not provide clear proof that these drugs are efficacious in the setting of metastatic disease. Advancement of a therapy to the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings without such evidence is exceptional, but seems reasonable in the case of PARP inhibitors because the target population that might benefit from this class of drugs is small and well defined. This Review describes the evolution of PARP inhibitors from bench to bedside, and provides an up-to-date description of the key published or otherwise reported clinical trials of these agents. The specific considerations and challenges that might be encountered when implementing these compounds in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in the clinic are also highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 377 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 15%
Student > Master 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Student > Postgraduate 29 7%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 73 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 6%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 78 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,218,154
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#310
of 2,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,602
of 255,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.