| Title |
The Diagnostic Value of One-Step Nucleic acid Amplification (OSNA) for Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Colon Cancer Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3820-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. J. Vogelaar, M. S. Reimers, R. L. A. van der Linden, J. C. van der Linden, V. T. H. B. M. Smit, D. J. Lips, C. J. H. van de Velde, K. Bosscha |
| Abstract |
Lymph node status in colon cancer is critical for prognosis estimation and treatment allocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) through detection of cytokeratin 19 mRNA levels with routine pathological examination (RP) and multilevel fine pathological examination (FP) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), detected using the ex vivo SLN mapping (SLNM) procedure, in presurgically defined nonmetastatic colon cancer patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,942,701
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,376
of 6,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,683
of 229,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.