You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antiretroviral Therapy Uptake, Attrition, Adherence and Outcomes among HIV-Infected Female Sex Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0105645 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Mountain, Sharmistha Mishra, Peter Vickerman, Michael Pickles, Charles Gilks, Marie-Claude Boily |
Abstract |
We aimed to characterize the antiretroviral therapy (ART) cascade among female sex workers (FSWs) globally. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 75% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 214 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 48 | 22% |
Researcher | 29 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
Other | 36 | 17% |
Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 36 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Psychology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 11% |
Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,103,927
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,582
of 208,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,291
of 257,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#884
of 5,268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.