↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-403
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Gee Kee, Roy M Kimble, Leila Cuttle, Kellie Stockton

Abstract

In the paediatric population, pain and distress associated with burn injuries during wound care procedures remain a constant challenge. Although silver dressings are the gold standard for burn care in Australasia, very few high-level trials have been conducted that compare silver dressings to determine which will provide the best level of care clinically. Therefore, for paediatric patients in particular, identifying silver dressings that are associated with lower levels of pain and rapid wound re-epithelialisation is imperative. This study will determine whether there is a difference in time to re-epithelialisation and pain and distress experienced during wound care procedures among Acticoat™, Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ and Mepilex Ag™ dressings for acute, paediatric partial thickness burns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 28 26%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 41 38%