Title |
Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-403 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma Gee Kee, Roy M Kimble, Leila Cuttle, Kellie Stockton |
Abstract |
In the paediatric population, pain and distress associated with burn injuries during wound care procedures remain a constant challenge. Although silver dressings are the gold standard for burn care in Australasia, very few high-level trials have been conducted that compare silver dressings to determine which will provide the best level of care clinically. Therefore, for paediatric patients in particular, identifying silver dressings that are associated with lower levels of pain and rapid wound re-epithelialisation is imperative. This study will determine whether there is a difference in time to re-epithelialisation and pain and distress experienced during wound care procedures among Acticoat™, Acticoat™ combined with Mepitel™ and Mepilex Ag™ dressings for acute, paediatric partial thickness burns. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 26% |
Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 38% |