You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reserve Sizes Needed to Protect Coral Reef Fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12415 |
| Authors |
Nils C. Krueck, Christelle Legrand, Gabby N. Ahmadia, Estradivari, Alison Green, Geoffrey P. Jones, Cynthia Riginos, Eric A. Treml, Peter J. Mumby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Australia | 6 | 15% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Seychelles | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 54% |
| Scientists | 17 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,233,040
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#408
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,082
of 335,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.