↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle: A Brief Review of Structure and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,909)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
922 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2762 Mendeley
Title
Skeletal Muscle: A Brief Review of Structure and Function
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00223-014-9915-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter R. Frontera, Julien Ochala

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is one of the most dynamic and plastic tissues of the human body. In humans, skeletal muscle comprises approximately 40 % of total body weight and contains 50-75 % of all body proteins. In general, muscle mass depends on the balance between protein synthesis and degradation and both processes are sensitive to factors such as nutritional status, hormonal balance, physical activity/exercise, and injury or disease, among others. In this review, we discuss the various domains of muscle structure and function including its cytoskeletal architecture, excitation-contraction coupling, energy metabolism, and force and power generation. We will limit the discussion to human skeletal muscle and emphasize recent scientific literature on single muscle fibers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,762 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 2750 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 431 16%
Student > Master 422 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 390 14%
Researcher 146 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 105 4%
Other 286 10%
Unknown 982 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 498 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 246 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 236 9%
Sports and Recreations 171 6%
Engineering 122 4%
Other 409 15%
Unknown 1080 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#650,213
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#25
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,735
of 269,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.