↓ Skip to main content

A Meta‐Analysis of After‐School Programs That Seek to Promote Personal and Social Skills in Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,148)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
731 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
948 Mendeley
Title
A Meta‐Analysis of After‐School Programs That Seek to Promote Personal and Social Skills in Children and Adolescents
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph A. Durlak, Roger P. Weissberg, Molly Pachan

Abstract

A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to enhance the personal and social skills of children and adolescents indicated that, compared to controls, participants demonstrated significant increases in their self-perceptions and bonding to school, positive social behaviors, school grades and levels of academic achievement, and significant reductions in problem behaviors. The presence of four recommended practices associated with previously effective skill training (SAFE: sequenced, active, focused, and explicit) moderated several program outcomes. One important implication of current findings is that ASPs should contain components to foster the personal and social skills of youth because youth can benefit in multiple ways if these components are offered. The second implication is that further research is warranted on identifying program characteristics that can help us understand why some programs are more successful than others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 948 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 910 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 169 18%
Student > Master 159 17%
Researcher 110 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 109 11%
Student > Bachelor 65 7%
Other 145 15%
Unknown 191 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 288 30%
Psychology 251 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 3%
Arts and Humanities 26 3%
Other 109 11%
Unknown 217 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#179,642
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#4
of 1,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#407
of 103,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them